What in this case is the
condition.
Or how would I get a contradiction?
E.g. if I said
they || A B C
D are equidistant, α β γ δ
are not equidistant & parallel lines are drawn
between them.
And here Russell
's correlation
seems to furnish a criterion of their
correlatability.
A logical criterion.
Isn't it very queer that by just looking at the names I should
be able to say whether or not a certain relation held between the
objects?
But
I correlate the names.
And why?
To see whether a correlation
can exist || subsist
between the things.
Correlation
Correspondence
We draw lines in our
thought.