Imagine a game played on a kind of
chessboard. You can extend the game to 64, 81,
100, etc. squares & the situation which is
losing in the 64-game is winning
9
in the 81-game, losing
in the 100-game, winning in the 121-game
etc..
If you are asked “what did ‘meaning what
he said’ consist in” you will describe
phenomena || facts which
however
supplemented by certain other facts would be
characteristic of his
not meaning what he said, –
and so on.