‘Is there then
no such thing as a mental picture?’ The proper
answer to a question thus worded would be // is // : ‘People at
times have mental pictures image’. But this
doesn't isn't really the sort
of answer we wanted. We meant to ask: have we a
right, under the circumstances under
25 which it's normally said
that a person man sees has a mental image, to say that he has such an image or
picture? Have we a right to say that a
man someone
marie[s|d] money? This may mean did he
‘mar⌊r⌋y money’ or is the expression an
appropriate one. Think of the ways ˇin which such a
question is decided? – Suppose we ask the
question: [do|ar]e people murder⌊e⌋d in
tragedies or aren't they? One answer
is: In some tragedies some
people areˇ murdered& not in
others ⌊.⌋ Another answer:
‘people aren't really murdered
26 be a peasant he is really
Gl.'s son. //
We
shall say the word ‘really’
‘pretend’, ‘die’
etc. are used in a peculiar way when we talk of a play
& differently in ordinary life. Or:
the criteria for a man d[ie|y]ing in a play
arent
th[o|e]se same as
those of his dieing in reality.
But are we justified to say that
Lear dies at the end of
the play? Why not. And, analogously, that
there is no reason for objecting to saying we have see
mental
27 |
To cite this element you can use the following URL:
BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,24v[2]et25r[1]et25v[1]et26r[1]et26v[1]_d
RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,24v[2]et25r[1]et25v[1]et26r[1]et26v[1]_d/rdf
JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ms-166,24v[2]et25r[1]et25v[1]et26r[1]et26v[1]_d/json