When we say A judges that etc., then we have to mention a whole proposition which A judges. It will not do either to mention only its constituent or its constituent || constituents, or its constituents and form, but not in the proper order. This shows that a proposition itself must occur in the statement that it is judged; however, for instance, “not-p” may be explained. || , p must occur in it.       Always a question that is negated must have a meaning. Rott! || , the || . The question „What is negated” must have a meaning. Rott!