Collapse

Annotate using Feed The Pundit

Take (φ).φ!x. Then if we describe the kind of symbolschˇ, for which φ! stands & which, by the above, is enough to determine the type, then automatically “([x|φ]).φ!x” cannot be fi[ll|tt]ed by this descri[l|p]tion[.|,] because it contains „φ!x” & the description is to describe all that symbolizes in symbols of the φ! – kind. If the description is thus complete vicious circles can just as little occur as if for instance in

(φ).(x)_φ
(φ).φ(x)

(where (x)_φ is a subject-predicat prop)

Ts-201a1,b1

1

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.

To cite this element you can use the following URL:

BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,a7[3]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,a7[3]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,a7[3]_d/json