​ 
       Russell's “complexes” were to have the useful property of being compounded, & were to combine with this the agreeable property that they could be treated as ˇlike “simples”. But this alone made them unserviceable as logical types, since there would have been significance in asserting, of a simple, that it was complex. But a property cannot be a logical type.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b9[2]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b9[2]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a1,b9[2]_d/json