When we say A judges that etc., then we have to
mention a whole proposition which A judges.
It will not do either to mention only its constituents, or its
constituents and form, but not in the proper order.
This shows that a proposition itself must occur in the statement that
it is judged; however, for instance, “not-p” may be explained, the
question, “What is negated” must have a
meaning.
*
Russell – for instance
imagines every fact as a spatial complex.
3