​ 
      When we say A judges that etc., then we have to mention a whole proposition which A judges. It will not do either to mention only its constituents, or its constituents and form, but not in the proper order. This shows that a proposition itself must occur in the statement that it is judged; however, for instance, “not-p” may be explained, the question, “What is negated” must have a meaning.
⌊⌊ˇ* Russell – for instance imagines every fact as a spatial complex.⌋⌋
3
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,a2[4]_d/json