​ 
      In place of every proposition “p”, let us write “
a
b
p”. Let every correlation of propositions to each other or of names to propositions be effected by a correlation of their poles “a” and “b”. Let this correlation be transitive. Then accordingly “
a ‒ a
b ‒ b
p” is the same symbol as “
a
b
p”. Let n propositions be given. I then call a “class of poles” of these propositions every class of n members, of which each is a pole of one of the n propositions, so that one member corresponds to each proposition. I then correlate with each class of poles one of two poles (a and b). The sense of the symbolizing fact thus constructed I cannot define, but I know it.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,b13[2]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,b13[2]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-201a2,b13[2]_d/json