Suppose that the person to whom the commands
in
(a) and
in (b) are given
has to look up
in || is || has to refer
to a table
which || that
correlates names with || in which names correspond || are
correlated to pictures before he brings
what is demanded || the object:
Does || does
he
then do the
same thing when
he carries out a
command in (a) and when he carries || carrying out a command
in (a) as || and when carrying out
the corresponding command in (b)? –
Yes and no.
You may say
, || :
“
The || the
point of the two commands is the same.”
I shou
ld
say the
same here || , in this case, say the same.
But it
is
not || isn't always clear
what one
is || what's one to call || what's to be
called the “point” of
the || a command.
(In the same way one can say of certain things that their purpose is
so and so || such and such.
What is essential is
that
that || this
is a
lamp, that
46
¤
it
is || it's used for lighting
,
– that it decorates the room, fills an empty space,
etc., is not essential.
But essential and unessential
are
not || aren't always clearly separated.)