​ 
       Suppose that the person to whom the commands ˇin (a) and ˇin (b) are given has to look up in ˇis has to refer to a table ˇin which that correlates names with ˇcorrespond are correlated to pictures before he brings
the object
what is demanded
: [D|d]oes he then do the [d|s]ame thing when he carr[ies|ying] out a command in (a) a[n|s]d and when he carr[ies|ying] out the corresponding command in (b)? – Yes and no. You may say, : “[T|t]he point of the two commands is the same.” I shou[d|l]d,ˇ, in this case,, say the same here. But it is_ n[o|']t always clear what's one is to ˇbe called the “point” of
a
the
 command. (In the same way one can say of certain things that their purpose is
such and such
so and so
. What is essential is [h|t]hat th[at|is] is a lamp, that
46
that it's is used for lighting, – that it decorates the room, fills an empty space, etc., is not essential. But essential and unessent unessential are_ n[o|']t always clearly separated.)
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,45[3]et46[1]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,45[3]et46[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,45[3]et46[1]_d/json