“But if the concept ‘game’ is
unlimited in this way || , in this way,
unbounded, then you don't really know what you mean
by ‘game’.” –
If I give the
description
, || :
“The ground was covered with
flowers || plants”, will you say
that || that I don't know
what I am talking about
so || as long
as I can't give a definition of a plant?
Socrates (in
Charmides): “You know it and can
speak
Hellenic || Greek, so
you must
surely || surely you must be able to say it.”
–
No.
To
“know
it” || ‘know it’ does not mean
here to be able to say it.
That || This
is
not || isn'tour criterion of knowing
here || , here, our criterion of knowing.
An explanation of what I
mean || meant would
be, say, a painted picture and the
words
, || :
“
That || this
is roughly what the ground looked like”.
But
I may say
also, || : || perhaps
I say:
“
That || This
is
exactly what it looked like”. –
Then were exactly
these grasses || blades of grass
and leaves in these positions
there?
No,
that || this
isn't what it means.
And I
would || should || should
not recognise any picture as
51
¤ exact || an exact one
in
this sense.