What does it mean◇, to kn[w|o]w what a game is? What does it mean, to know it and not be ab[e|l]e to say it? Is this knowledge some equivalent of a definition

which
that

is not uttered unuttered?

Such
So

that, if it were uttered, I might recognise it as the expression of my knowledge? Is_ n[o|']t my knowledge, my concept, of a ‘game’, expressed entirely in the explanations

which
that

I could
I might

give? namely in the fact that I desc describe In describing examples of various kinds of games, ˇin showing how you can construct all sorts of other games in analogy with these ˇanalogous to these in all sorts of ways, in saying that I should hardly call so and so a game any more[,| ;] such & such, games; and so forth.

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.