​ 
       The avowal of a form ˇSuch
an adoption of
a declaration in favour of
 a particular form of expression, if it's is expressed in the guise of a
statement
proposition
 that treats of about thech objects ˇconcerned (rather t[a|h]an of about si[n|g]ns) must be “a priori”. For its opposite becomes really unthinkable, insofar as there corresponds to it ˇas a form of thought, a form of expression, which we have excluded.
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.



To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,70[2]_d

RDF: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,70[2]_d/rdf

JSON: http://wittgensteinsource.org/BTE/Ts-226,70[2]_d/json