I
suppose we imagine the correspondence to have been verified
12.
experimentally. Let us imagine such an experiment
crudely. It consists in looking at the brain while the
subject thinks. And now you may think that the reason
why my explanation is going to go wrong is that of course the
experimenter gets the thoughts of the subject only
indirectly by being told them, the subject
expressing them in some way or the other. But I
will remove this difficulty by assuming that the subject is at the
same time the experimenter, who is looking at his own brain, say by
means of a mirror. (The crudity of this description
in no way reduces the force of the argument.)