Note that in the game 33) I distinguished sharply between the order
to be carried out and the rule employed.
In 34) on the other hand, we called the sentence
“c a d a” a rule, & it was the
order.
Imagine also this variation:
41). The game is similar to
33), but the pupil is not just trained to use a single table; but the
training aims at making the pupil use any table correlating letters with
arrows.
Now by this I mean no more than that the training is of a peculiar
kind, roughly speaking one analogous to that described in 30).
I will refer to a training more or less similar to that in 30)
as a “
general training”.
General trainings form a family whose members differ greatly from one
another.
The kind of thing I'm thinking of now mainly
consists:
a) of a training in a
limited range of actions,
b) of giving the pupil a lead
to extend this range, &
c) of random exercises
and tests.
After the general training the order is now to consist in giving him
a sign of this kind:
He carries out the order by moving thus:
.
Here I suppose we should say the table, the rule, is
part of
the order.