In the case 67), by calling certain creatures “reading
machines” we meant only that they react in a particular way to
seeing printed signs.
No connection between seeing and reacting, no internal mechanism
enters into this case.
It would be absurd if the trainer had answered to the question whether
he read the word “table” or not,
“Perhaps he read it”, for there is no
doubt in this case about what he actually did.
The change which took place was one which we might call a change in
the general behaviour of the pupil, and we have in this case not given a
meaning to the expression, “The first word in the new
era”.
(Compare with this the following case:
∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙
In our figure a row of dots with large intervals succeeds a row of dots
with small intervals.
Which is the last dot in the first sequence and which the first dot in
the second?
Imagine our dots were holes in the revolving disc of a siren.
Then we should hear a tone of low pitch following a tone of high
pitch (or vice versa).
Ask yourself: At which moment does the tone of low pitch
begin and the other end?)