¿We said¿ that what we described
as “numeral equality”, “being
1-1 correlated”, “having the number
n” were widely differing phenomena.
That therefore it was an ilusion
to think that to say “the classes
fall in pairs” is, generally speaking
an analysis of what we call
numeric equality in simpler terms.
We can if we like put “being numerically
equal” = “falling into pairs” but
the use of the one expression just as of the
other has got to be explained
in the particular case. This we
only forgett. Thinking about a very
special class of examples.
  
The ideas that if they
ha[b|v]e the right existential
structure they do fall
into cou[l|p]les & this is
demonstrated. The
question how we find out in the
special case that they do have
the right s[p|t]ructures is neglected.
  One could also say that a
length a was twice another one b
if the two a superimposed gave
b. Application for wavelengths.
   This brings me to the topic of

8
demonstration.
     1)
Nr. of outer vert = Nr of
inner vert
5.

   Compare with “the Hand has 5 Fingers.”
  Timelessness. The save hold of
“The number of outer vert. = Nr of inner
vert”
    Question which is answered by
this prop timeless. ˇApparent Generality of demonstr.
    The copula has no tenses.
  <…> idea is that the idea of a penta-
gram is bound up with a cardinal
Nr. Now, we could make all sorts of
connections.

“It is the essence of these figures
to be capable of being devided connected in
this way”.




9